Meet Ryan, a senior software engineer at a major tech company. At 32, he's earning $220,000 annually, has $150,000 in his 401(k), and just received a $180,000 RSU vest. On paper, he should be able to afford a nice home. But after months of house hunting in Seattle, he's feeling frustrated and confused.
"I make more money than my parents ever dreamed of," Ryan told us during our first meeting. "But somehow I can't afford the same lifestyle they had. What am I doing wrong?"
The answer? Nothing. Ryan isn't failing—the traditional rules of home affordability are failing him.
If you're a high-earning professional feeling priced out of homeownership despite your substantial income, you're not alone. The relationship between income and housing costs has fundamentally shifted, and the old rules of thumb simply don't work in today's market.
The broken math of home affordability
For decades, financial advisors recommended the "28% rule"—spend no more than 28% of your gross monthly income on housing costs. This rule made sense when it was created in the 1980s, but let's see how it works today.
Ryan's situation by the old rules:
- Annual income: $220,000
- Monthly gross income: $18,333
- 28% rule allowance: $5,133/month for housing
Sounds reasonable, right? But here's the reality check:
Median home price in Seattle: $875,000
- 20% down payment: $175,000
- Monthly payment with 7% interest: $6,200
- Add property taxes and insurance: $7,100/month total
Ryan's "affordable" payment according to the 28% rule: $5,133 His actual cost for a median home: $7,100
The gap? Nearly $2,000 per month, or 38% more than traditional guidelines suggest he can afford.
Why traditional affordability rules are outdated
The 28% rule was created when home prices were roughly 3-4 times median household income. Today, in major metropolitan areas where most high-paying jobs are located, homes cost 8-12 times median income.
Consider the math shift:
- 1985: Median home $84,000, median income $23,000 (3.6x ratio)
- 2024: Median home $420,000, median income $70,000 (6x ratio)
- Tech hubs 2024: Median home $800,000+, median income $85,000 (9.4x+ ratio)
The fundamental assumption underlying traditional affordability calculations—that housing costs would remain proportional to income—has been shattered.
The real cost beyond the mortgage
One of the biggest mistakes first-time buyers make is focusing only on the monthly mortgage payment. The true cost of homeownership includes several additional expenses that can add 20-40% to your monthly housing costs.
The full picture of monthly housing costs:
- Principal and interest: The base mortgage payment
- Property taxes: Often 1-2% of home value annually
- Homeowners insurance: $1,000-$3,000+ annually depending on location
- PMI: If you put down less than 20%, add 0.3-1.5% of loan amount annually
- HOA fees: $200-$800+ monthly in many areas
- Maintenance and repairs: Budget 1-3% of home value annually
- Utilities: Often higher than renting, especially for larger homes
Ryan's real monthly costs on an $875,000 home:
- Mortgage payment (7%, 20% down): $4,700
- Property taxes: $730
- Insurance: $200
- Maintenance reserve: $550
- Total: $6,180/month
And this assumes Ryan has $175,000 available for the down payment—money that could otherwise be invested for retirement or other goals.
The high earner's unique challenges
High-earning professionals face specific challenges that traditional affordability guidelines don't address:
Variable income: RSUs, bonuses, and stock options create income that looks great on paper but isn't guaranteed or consistent.
High tax burden: A $200,000 salary doesn't equal $200,000 in spending power. After federal taxes, state taxes, and 401(k) contributions, take-home pay might be $130,000 or less.
Location constraints: High-paying jobs are concentrated in expensive metropolitan areas where housing costs are extreme.
Lifestyle inflation: Higher incomes often come with higher expenses—nicer cars, better restaurants, more travel—reducing available income for housing.
Student loan debt: Many high earners carry substantial student loans that affect debt-to-income ratios.
A smarter approach to home affordability
Instead of relying on outdated percentage rules, successful home buying in today's market requires a more sophisticated approach:
1. Calculate your true take-home pay
Start with your actual monthly cash flow, not gross income:
Example calculation for $200,000 salary:
- Gross monthly income: $16,667
- Federal taxes (24% bracket): -$3,333
- State taxes (varies by state): -$833
- 401(k) contribution (15%): -$2,500
- Student loan payments: -$800
- Net available income: $9,201
Now apply affordability percentages to this real number, not the gross amount.
2. Factor in equity compensation strategically
RSUs and stock options complicate traditional income calculations. Consider these strategies:
Income stability analysis: Use only your base salary for qualification purposes initially. Treat equity compensation as a bonus for down payment or debt reduction.
Strategic timing: Plan RSU sales around home purchases to optimize down payment size and tax implications.
Risk assessment: Equity compensation can be volatile. Don't base your housing budget on peak values or assume continued appreciation.
3. Optimize your debt-to-income ratio
Lenders typically want to see a debt-to-income ratio below 43%. For high earners, this often means:
Pay down existing debt: Student loans, car payments, and credit card balances all count against you.
Timing major purchases: Avoid taking on new debt (like a car loan) in the months before applying for a mortgage.
Consider payment strategies: Sometimes paying down debt provides better qualification benefits than saving for a larger down payment.
4. Rethink the 20% down payment rule
While 20% down eliminates PMI, it's not always the optimal strategy:
PMI isn't always bad: In a rising market, getting in sooner with 10-15% down might be better than waiting to save 20%.
Opportunity cost analysis: Money used for a down payment can't be invested elsewhere. Run the numbers on 10% down plus investing the difference.
Cash flow considerations: A smaller down payment preserves liquidity for emergencies and other goals.
Real-world affordability strategies
Let's look at how successful clients have navigated today's housing market:
Case Study 1: The Strategic RSU Sale
Background: Sarah, product manager, $180,000 base salary plus $120,000 annual RSU vests
Challenge: Wanted to buy a $650,000 condo but couldn't qualify based on base salary alone
Solution:
- Timed RSU sales over two years to establish consistent income history
- Used part of RSU proceeds to pay off student loans, improving debt-to-income ratio
- Put down 15% instead of 20%, preserving cash for emergencies
- Qualified at 38% debt-to-income ratio using documented RSU income
Result: Purchased target home while maintaining strong financial position
Case Study 2: The Multi-Income Strategy
Background: David and Lisa, both software engineers, combined $350,000 income
Challenge: High tax burden and expensive Bay Area market
Solution:
- Calculated affordability based on net take-home pay, not gross income
- Used both salaries for qualification but sized payment to be affordable on one income
- Purchased in up-and-coming neighborhood rather than established expensive areas
- Planned for potential job changes or family expansion
Result: Bought a home they could comfortably afford even with life changes
The psychology of high-earner home buying
Beyond the financial calculations, high earners often face unique psychological challenges:
Lifestyle expectations: Earning a high income creates pressure to live in certain neighborhoods or home types that may not align with financial reality.
Peer comparison: When colleagues are buying expensive homes, it's easy to assume you should too, regardless of your specific financial situation.
Future income assumptions: It's tempting to buy based on expected future income rather than current reality.
Loss aversion: The fear of being "priced out forever" can lead to hasty decisions or overextending financially.
Understanding these psychological factors can help you make more rational decisions about home affordability.
Alternative paths to homeownership
If traditional home buying seems out of reach, consider these alternatives:
Geographic arbitrage: Consider areas with lower cost-of-living but good remote work opportunities.
Starter homes: Buy what you can afford now rather than waiting for your "forever home."
Condos vs. houses: Condominiums often offer more affordable entry points in expensive markets.
Fixer-uppers: If you have time and skills, properties needing work can offer value opportunities.
House hacking: Buy a duplex, live in one side, rent the other to offset costs.
The rent vs. buy analysis for high earners
Sometimes the smartest financial decision is to keep renting, especially for high earners. Consider renting when:
The purchase premium is extreme: If buying costs 60%+ more than renting equivalent space, investing the difference might be better.
Career flexibility is important: Renting provides mobility for job changes or relocations.
Investment opportunities exist: If you can invest down payment money at higher returns than home appreciation, renting might be optimal.
Market timing concerns: In overheated markets, waiting for corrections while renting can make sense.
Tax considerations for high-earner homeowners
Homeownership tax benefits are more complex for high earners:
SALT deduction limits: The $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions reduces the benefit of property tax deductions.
Mortgage interest limits: Interest deduction is capped at debt up to $750,000 for homes purchased after 2017.
Alternative Minimum Tax: High earners may face AMT, which can reduce the value of homeownership deductions.
Opportunity cost: Tax benefits must be weighed against the opportunity cost of investing down payment money elsewhere.
Working with lenders as a high earner
High-earning borrowers often face unique challenges with traditional lenders:
Income documentation: RSUs, bonuses, and other variable compensation require careful documentation and often averaging over multiple years.
Bank statement programs: For self-employed or variable income earners, some lenders offer programs based on bank deposits rather than tax returns.
Jumbo loan requirements: Loans above $766,550 (2024 limit) have stricter requirements and different rate structures.
Asset verification: Large investment accounts and equity compensation require detailed documentation.
Timing your home purchase strategically
For high earners, timing a home purchase involves more than just market conditions:
RSU vesting schedules: Plan purchases around large vests to optimize down payment size and tax implications.
Bonus timing: Year-end bonuses can provide down payment funds but may affect qualification timing.
Tax year considerations: Large sales of appreciated assets for down payments have tax implications that should be planned carefully.
Life transitions: Job changes, marriage, or family expansion should factor into timing decisions.
Building wealth while homeowning
Homeownership shouldn't derail your other financial goals. Successful high-earner homeowners:
Maintain retirement savings: Don't reduce 401(k) contributions to afford a house payment.
Preserve emergency funds: Keep 6+ months of expenses in cash, separate from down payment funds.
Continue investing: Don't put all excess cash into the house; maintain a diversified investment strategy.
Plan for maintenance: Budget for ongoing home costs to avoid credit card debt for repairs.
Creating your personal affordability formula
Rather than following generic rules, create your own affordability calculation:
- Calculate true take-home pay after all taxes and essential expenses
- Subtract fixed obligations (student loans, car payments, other debt)
- Reserve emergency fund money (don't count this toward housing)
- Budget for other goals (retirement, travel, other priorities)
- Apply housing percentage to remaining amount (consider 30-40% of remaining income)
This approach ensures housing fits into your complete financial picture rather than dominating it.
Key Takeaways
Home affordability for high earners isn't about following outdated rules—it's about understanding your complete financial picture and making strategic decisions based on your specific situation.
The key principles:
- Use net income, not gross, for affordability calculations
- Factor in all costs, not just mortgage payments
- Consider opportunity costs of down payment money
- Plan strategically around equity compensation and variable income
- Maintain perspective on your other financial goals
Remember, homeownership is a lifestyle choice as much as a financial one. The "right" decision depends on your priorities, life stage, and long-term goals—not just what you can technically afford.
Ready to navigate today's housing market strategically?
At Domain Money, our CFP® professionals specialize in helping high-earning professionals make smart homeownership decisions. We'll analyze your complete financial picture, optimize your qualification strategy, and ensure your home purchase aligns with your broader wealth-building goals.
From RSU timing strategies to debt optimization, we understand the unique challenges high earners face in today's housing market. Don't let outdated affordability rules limit your options or pressure you into poor decisions.
Schedule a free strategy session today to create a personalized home affordability plan that works with your income, goals, and today's market realities.
The scenarios described in this article are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual client situations. Individual results may vary based on personal circumstances, market conditions, and local real estate factors. Home affordability calculations should consider your complete financial picture and long-term goals. Consult with qualified financial and real estate professionals before making major housing decisions.
.jpeg)
.jpg)