Assets under management fees are exactly what they sound like: you pay a percentage of your total invested assets to your financial advisor each year. The industry standard is typically 1% annually, though it can range from 0.5% to 2% depending on your advisor and the services provided.
On the surface, this seems fair. You pay more as your wealth grows because you have more to manage. But let's examine how this impacts your wealth over time.
Consider two clients who both start with $300,000 portfolios:
Client A maintains a $300,000 portfolio over 10 years
- Annual fee: $3,000
- Total fees paid: $30,000
Client B grows their portfolio to $1.2 million over 10 years through market gains and additional contributions
- Annual fee in year 10: $12,000
- Total fees paid over 10 years: approximately $75,000
Client B, who was more successful at building wealth, paid $45,000 more in fees for fundamentally the same service. They're being penalized for their financial success.
The real math behind AUM fees
Let's dive deeper into how these fees compound over time. Assume you start with $500,000 and add $50,000 annually while earning a 7% average return. Here's how your AUM fees would grow:
Year 1: Portfolio $535,000 → Fee: $5,350 Year 5: Portfolio $750,000 → Fee: $7,500
Year 10: Portfolio $1.1M → Fee: $11,000 Year 15: Portfolio $1.6M → Fee: $16,000 Year 20: Portfolio $2.3M → Fee: $23,000
Over 20 years, you'd pay approximately $275,000 in advisor fees. That's money that could have been invested and grown to over $530,000 by retirement if invested at 7% annual returns.
But here's the kicker: the amount of work your advisor does in year 20 probably isn't dramatically different from year 1. You still need a financial plan, investment management, and periodic check-ins. The core work remains largely the same, but your cost has more than quadrupled.
Why the financial industry loves AUM fees
AUM fees are incredibly popular with financial advisors and wealth management firms, and it's not hard to see why. They create a predictable, growing revenue stream that scales automatically with client success and market performance.
From a business perspective, AUM fees are brilliant:
- Automatic growth: As markets rise and clients add money, fees increase without any additional sales effort
- Sticky clients: Once clients have substantial assets with an advisor, switching becomes psychologically difficult
- Passive income: Fees are deducted automatically from client accounts, requiring no ongoing collection effort
- Scalable model: Advisors can manage more assets without increasing their workload
But what's good for advisor businesses isn't necessarily good for client wealth building.
The misaligned incentives problem
AUM fees create a fundamental misalignment between advisor and client interests. While advisors want to grow your assets (which benefits you), they also benefit financially from keeping you invested with them rather than using your money for other financial goals.
Consider these common scenarios:
Paying off your mortgage early: This might make financial and psychological sense for you, but it reduces your advisor's fee-generating assets.
Buying investment real estate: Real estate might be a smart diversification move, but dollars invested in property don't generate AUM fees.
Starting a business: Using investment assets to fund a business venture might be the right move for your goals, but it directly reduces your advisor's income.
Large charitable giving: Donating appreciated securities is tax-smart, but it reduces the assets generating fees.
In each case, the best financial decision for you might conflict with your advisor's revenue interests. This doesn't mean advisors are acting maliciously, but the fee structure creates subtle pressure to keep assets invested rather than exploring other financial strategies.
The complexity myth
The financial industry often justifies increasing AUM fees by suggesting that larger portfolios require proportionally more work to manage. But is this really true?
Investment management: Whether you have $300,000 or $3 million, the process of selecting appropriate index funds, rebalancing, and tax-loss harvesting doesn't become 10 times more complex.
Financial planning: Your core planning needs—retirement projections, tax strategy, insurance analysis—don't scale linearly with wealth. A $2 million portfolio might require some additional estate planning considerations, but not $20,000 worth of additional work annually.
Account maintenance: Modern technology handles most routine portfolio management tasks. Rebalancing $3 million doesn't take 10 times longer than rebalancing $300,000.
Client communication: Whether discussing a $500,000 or $5 million portfolio, quarterly reviews and annual planning meetings take roughly the same amount of time.
The reality is that while larger portfolios may require some additional considerations, the work doesn't scale linearly with asset size. Yet AUM fees assume it does.
The flat-fee alternative
This is where flat-fee financial planning offers a compelling alternative. Instead of paying a percentage of your assets, you pay a fixed annual fee for comprehensive financial planning services.
Here's how the math works out differently:
Traditional AUM model (1% fee):
- $500K portfolio: $5,000/year
- $1M portfolio: $10,000/year
- $2M portfolio: $20,000/year
Flat-fee model (example pricing):
- Any portfolio size: $7,500/year
- Same comprehensive planning and investment guidance
- Predictable costs regardless of wealth growth
Under the flat-fee model, our hypothetical client with the growing portfolio would save $12,500 per year once their assets reached $2 million—money that stays invested and continues growing.
What flat-fee planning typically includes
A comprehensive flat-fee financial planning service should provide everything you'd expect from a traditional wealth manager:
Investment management: Portfolio construction, asset allocation, rebalancing, and tax-efficient investing strategies.
Financial planning: Retirement planning, tax strategy, insurance analysis, estate planning coordination, and goal-based financial modeling.
Ongoing support: Regular check-ins, plan updates as life changes, and access to your advisor for questions and guidance.
Specialized expertise: Help with equity compensation, tax-loss harvesting, retirement account optimization, and other sophisticated strategies.
The key difference? You're paying for the expertise and service, not subsidizing a percentage of your wealth-building success.
Real-world case study: The cost difference
Let's examine how fee structures would affect a real client over time.
Meet Jennifer, a 35-year-old product manager who starts with $400,000 in investments and adds $40,000 annually. Assuming 7% average returns, here's how different fee structures would impact her wealth over 30 years:
Scenario 1: 1% AUM fees
- Portfolio value at 65: $2.8 million
- Total fees paid: $485,000
- Net wealth: $2.8 million
Scenario 2: Flat $6,000 annual fee
- Portfolio value at 65: $3.1 million
- Total fees paid: $180,000
- Net wealth: $3.1 million
The difference: Jennifer keeps an additional $300,000 under the flat-fee model—money that could fund several years of retirement or leave a substantial legacy.
This example assumes the flat fee remains constant, but even if it increased with inflation over 30 years, Jennifer would still come out significantly ahead.
When AUM fees might make sense
To be fair, AUM fees aren't universally bad. They can make sense in certain situations:
Very small portfolios: If you have less than $200,000 invested, a 1% fee might be more affordable than flat-fee planning.
Extensive hand-holding needed: Some clients require frequent communication and extensive behavioral coaching that justifies higher costs.
Complex alternative investments: If your portfolio includes private equity, hedge funds, or other complex investments requiring specialized oversight, higher fees might be warranted.
Full family office services: Ultra-wealthy families with complex trust structures, multiple entities, and extensive coordination needs might benefit from comprehensive AUM-based services.
For most high-earning professionals building wealth through traditional investments, however, flat-fee planning offers better value and aligned incentives.
The psychological barriers to change
Despite the clear mathematical advantages, many successful investors stick with AUM fee structures. Several psychological factors contribute to this:
Status quo bias: Once you're working with an advisor, switching feels disruptive and complicated.
Percentage blindness: A 1% fee sounds small, but $20,000 annually feels significant. The percentage format makes large fees seem smaller.
Relationship investment: After years with an advisor, the relationship itself becomes valuable, making fee concerns feel secondary.
Complexity avoidance: Researching alternatives and making changes requires time and mental energy that busy professionals often lack.
Success masking costs: When portfolios are growing strongly, rising fees get masked by overall wealth increases.
Understanding these biases can help you make more rational decisions about advisor compensation.
Making the switch: Practical considerations
If you're considering moving from an AUM model to flat-fee planning, here are key factors to evaluate:
Calculate your current costs: Add up what you paid in advisor fees last year. Many clients are surprised by the total when they see it clearly.
Project future costs: Estimate what you'll pay over the next 10-20 years under your current fee structure as your wealth grows.
Compare service levels: Ensure any flat-fee advisor provides comparable expertise and service to your current arrangement.
Consider transition costs: Factor in any potential tax implications of moving assets or changing investment strategies.
Evaluate the relationship: Sometimes the advisor relationship is worth paying extra for, but make sure you're making that choice consciously.
The future of financial planning fees
The financial planning industry is slowly evolving toward more transparent, client-friendly fee structures. Several trends are driving this change:
Technology efficiency: Robo-advisors and advanced software are reducing the cost of portfolio management, making percentage-based fees harder to justify.
Fee transparency regulations: New rules require clearer disclosure of all fees, making clients more aware of what they're paying.
Consumer awareness: High-earning clients are becoming more sophisticated about fee structures and demanding better value.
Competition: New entrants offering flat-fee and subscription-based models are forcing traditional firms to reconsider their pricing.
We expect to see continued movement toward flat-fee, subscription, and project-based pricing models that better align advisor and client interests.
Questions to ask your current advisor
If you're working with an AUM-based advisor, consider having an honest conversation about fees. Here are questions that can help:
- "What exactly am I paying for this year, and how does that justify the fee?"
- "How would my service change if I had half as much money invested with you?"
- "What alternatives do you offer to percentage-based fees?"
- "Can you break down the specific services I receive for my annual fee?"
- "How do you justify increasing fees as my wealth grows?"
A good advisor should be able to articulate their value proposition clearly and discuss fee structures transparently.
Key Takeaways
Your financial advisor should be helping you build wealth, not taking an ever-growing slice of it. While professional financial guidance is valuable and worth paying for, the fee structure should align with your interests rather than penalize your success.
AUM fees made sense in an era when investment management was labor-intensive and technology was limited. Today, with advanced portfolio management software and low-cost investment options, the justification for percentage-based fees is much weaker.
The goal isn't to pay the lowest possible fee—it's to get the best value for your money while ensuring your advisor's interests align with yours. For most successful professionals, flat-fee financial planning offers a more transparent, predictable, and wealth-friendly approach to getting expert guidance.
Remember: every dollar you save in unnecessary fees is a dollar that can grow and compound for your future. Over decades, those saved fees can represent hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional wealth.
Ready for financial planning that grows with you, not off you?
At Domain Money, we believe your financial success should benefit you, not inflate our fees. Our flat-fee model ensures you get expert CFP® guidance, comprehensive financial planning, and sophisticated investment strategies without the wealth penalty of traditional AUM fees.
Our transparent pricing means you'll know exactly what you're paying each year—and it won't increase just because you're successful at building wealth. Instead of paying more as you prosper, you'll keep more of what you've earned while still getting the professional guidance you need.
Ready to see how much you could save with flat-fee financial planning? Schedule a free strategy session today to learn how our approach can help you build wealth more efficiently while keeping your advisor costs predictable and reasonable.
The scenarios described in this article are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual client situations. Individual results may vary based on personal circumstances, market conditions, and specific fee structures. Fee calculations are approximate and based on hypothetical scenarios. When evaluating financial advisors, consider the full scope of services provided, not just fees alone.
.webp)
.jpg)
.jpeg)